"The punk placed a bomb next to a child. I don't need to know why.
Because why will not change the fact that he placed a bomb next to a child."
This message was sent via Twitter by Greg Gutfeld on April 20th.
On April 19, 2017, I added the actual tweet from Mr. Gutfeld.
Note: I agree one hundred percent with the righteous indignation.
However, after professional law enforcement agencies find accurate information about these two individuals, and after professional lawmakers use this information to pass better laws, the new information and the new laws may prevent further crimes.
When I say "professional" law enforcement and "professional" lawmakers, both phrases refer to people who will let the facts outweigh the politics.
This was not done when our embassy in Benghazi was attacked, and it was not done when thirteen U.S. soldiers were murdered at Fort Hood in Texas. Both are clear cases of murders being done by Islamic extremists, and both events have multiple sources of evidence that is ready for a courtroom, but in both cases, President Obama never acknowledged the fact that Muslims committed the crimes.
In the case of Benghazi, President Obama never allowed available units of the U.S. Military to fight back against the heavily-armed Islamic extremists who were attacking the embassy, which was located on U.S.-owned land, as is true with every U.S. Embassy.
Why has Presisent Obama refused to label Muslim extremism "terrorism"?
More information about Barak Obama's Muslim background is available in a story published by the Washington Times on September 11, 2012.
Because why will not change the fact that he placed a bomb next to a child."
This message was sent via Twitter by Greg Gutfeld on April 20th.
On April 19, 2017, I added the actual tweet from Mr. Gutfeld.
If you click on the date at the end of this tweet, you will see this tweet on his Twitter account.The punk placed a bomb next to a child. I don't need to know why. Because why will not change the fact that he placed a bomb next to a child— GregGutfeld (@greggutfeld) April 20, 2013
**********
Note: I agree one hundred percent with the righteous indignation.
However, after professional law enforcement agencies find accurate information about these two individuals, and after professional lawmakers use this information to pass better laws, the new information and the new laws may prevent further crimes.
When I say "professional" law enforcement and "professional" lawmakers, both phrases refer to people who will let the facts outweigh the politics.
This was not done when our embassy in Benghazi was attacked, and it was not done when thirteen U.S. soldiers were murdered at Fort Hood in Texas. Both are clear cases of murders being done by Islamic extremists, and both events have multiple sources of evidence that is ready for a courtroom, but in both cases, President Obama never acknowledged the fact that Muslims committed the crimes.
In the case of Benghazi, President Obama never allowed available units of the U.S. Military to fight back against the heavily-armed Islamic extremists who were attacking the embassy, which was located on U.S.-owned land, as is true with every U.S. Embassy.
Why has Presisent Obama refused to label Muslim extremism "terrorism"?
| Because President Obama IS a Muslim. This video was posted on YouTube Sept. 7, 2008. Barak was being interviewed by George Stephanopoulis of ABC News. At that time, he was a U.S. Senator and a candidate for the Presidency. |
More information about Barak Obama's Muslim background is available in a story published by the Washington Times on September 11, 2012.
No comments:
Post a Comment