Monday, December 7, 2015

To blame or not to blame, that is the question


The right answer is a consistent policy.



Consistency is often a necessary ingredient when solving complex issues.

If President Obama believes that wealthy people should pay more in taxes, then he should ensure that wealthy members of his own party (including the two wealthiest Americans, Bill Gates and Warren Buffett) also pay more.

If, on the other hand, Obama believes that wealthy people (like Bill Gates and Warren Buffett) should pay a more moderate tax rate, then that tax rate should also be available to wealthy Republicans, America's other party.

This policy represents consistency, which in turn represents the fairness that Obama has said, repeatedly, that he wants in many of his policies.  Fairness was implicit in the speech he made last night (December 6, 2015) when he said that people who are too dangerous to become airplane passengers should also be legally considered too dangerous to buy a gun.

Any consistently fair policy regarding the identification of terrorists would either include Muslims or else, it would exclude uniformed police officers, as shown in the photo above.

Thank you to Dr. Marty Fox, whose Twitter account provided the above photo on December 7, 2015.  His account is @DrMartyFox

The words "To be or not to be" are part of a Shakespeare play called Hamlet.

This video is part of a movie that is based on the play.

Lawrence Olivier plays the Danish king in this movie.

He was chosen to be a member of Great Britain's House of Lords, but he preferred to be known for his knighthood, as Sir Lawrence Olivier.

The entry for him in Encyclopedia Britanica.

The entry for him on the Biography Channel.

Fairness also means that when a British man has accomplished as much as he has, there should be an entry for him in the Encyclopedia Britannica and on the Biography Channel.

Fairness also means that when a large percentage of the Muslims in any country violently demands the world-wide acceptance of Sharia Law and other aspects of Muslim culture, then that nation's elected government should consider them to be trouble-makers, not members of a peaceful religion.

Link to my January 2013 essay The religion of peace is not peaceful or tolerant.

If the set of photos that are re-printed at the top of this page is an accurate portrayal of President Obama's inconsistent policies, then he is being unfair, either by criticizing the police unfairly or by not criticizing violent Muslims when they should be criticized.

To blame or not to blame.  That is the question he must answer if he is to be truly called a fair president.  The only alternative is to be called a biased president and unfair by the very definition of the word.

Thursday, December 3, 2015

Refugee roulette




This is the headline of a story dated September 5, 2015 in the U.K. Daily Mail.

More violent clashes in Lesbos as police struggle to cope with thousands of desperate migrants rushing to Greek Island before entering mainland Europe 



The news story says that 15,000 people have already arrived in that Greek island (Lesbos), hoping to leave there and enter Europe, where they will, I'm sure, cause more trouble with every law enforcement agency there.

Thousands of these invaders, masquerading as "Syrian refugees", have already arrived in America, thanks to the determined efforts of our Muslim President Barak Obama, who is hiding their religious status and even their travel plans from the Governors of our states.

Link to a story dated November 19, 2015 on the CNN website that says that more than half of our 50 Governors will refuse to admit any of these "refugees".

Sunday, November 15, 2015

President Obama recognizes a higher power


... and some people wonder why so many Americans want to see him replaced.

Link to my July 2012 essay Sample Articles of Impeachment, found on my main blog.  It mentions and documents unconstitutional nominations to questionable agencies, larceny, economic sabotage, and treason, but the page wasn't large enough to include the negligent homicide that was committed by him and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton at Benghazi, Libya.

Link to the summary of this list of impeachable offenses, found on this blog.

Link to my June 2013 essay An inconvenient truth, which explains, in detail, a Constitutional (and thus legal) procedure to remove any U.S. President from the White House.

Link to my May 2014 essay Mister President, it is time to leave.  It shows why being the U.S. President is a difficult job, and it shows why someone with a mental illness (like Obama's narcissism) is unfit for presidential duty.  The essay mentions Gaby Giffords, who wisely resigned her seat in the U.S. House of Representatives after she was shot in the head.

Link to my September 2014 essay Presidents must be accountable to their people.  It states a truth that is hard for some people to accept.  Mental illness can happen to anybody, even the U.S. President.

Link to my November 2014 essay A letter from a veteran to his Commander-in-Chief.  The letter was copied, verbatim and complete, from the Facebook page of a man who lost three limbs during his military service in Iraq.  He wrote a very eloquent letter condemning President Obama for his failure as a leader of combat troops.  My essay also includes a reminder that any U.S. president can be legally removed from the White House if he is declared unfit for duty using the Constitutional procedure that was mentioned in previous essays named on this page.

Saturday, November 14, 2015

President Obama is unfit for presidential duty


Both of these videos were uploaded to YouTube yesterday by ABC News, and both of these videos are hosted by George Stephanopoulos.

Starting at 1 minute in the first video:

George: But ISIS is gaining strength, aren't they?

The clueless president: I don't think they're gaining strength. What is true is that our goal has been, first, to contain, (he makes direct eye contact) and we have contained them, they have not gained ground in Iraq, and in Syria, they'll come in, they'll leave, but you don't see the systematic march by ISIL across the terrain.


This man is more than incompetent.  He is a clear and present danger to the United States.

It is one of his primary duties to protect the safety and the security of the United States and its' people, and when possible, the safety and security of the people of other countries, especially countries that have signed appropriate treaties with us, including the treaties that make us a member of the NATO organization.

France is a member of NATO.  They signed the treaties that made them a full member, and they expect us to help them fight murderous Muslims.

Since President Obama is doing nothing to help France fight murderous Muslims, he has now failed to fulfill his primary duty as president.

He should be removed immediately from the White House, either through impeachment or through the process in Article 25, Section 4 of the U.S. Constitution.

Wednesday, November 11, 2015

Facebook doesn't believe in freedom of speech


I reprinted this photo for three reasons.
  1. I believe in freedom of speech.

  2. I hate the Daesh, sometimes called ISIS.

  3. I hate anyone, including Facebook, who cares more about ISIS than about their victims.


Any executions that are done by a mob are an offense against humanity.

ANY executions.

Friday, July 10, 2015

I did it, Mom


This photo was posted on the Twitter account @RealMad_Humor June 2, 2015.




Yes, you did.  Good job, girl.

Friday, July 3, 2015

2016 Presidential Candidates

Bernie Sanders, former Governor of Vermont

Republicans

Note: All of the following people are either declared candidates or else, they have formed a Presidential Exploratory Committee.

An exploratory committee is registered with the Federal Election Commission.  It allows a potential candidate to do fundraising and polling, but the income and expenses don't have to be reported to the F.E.C. until the person becomes a formally-declared candidate.  Exploratory Committees have limits on the amount of money that can be raised from one person or group, but the actual amount of money that is raised can be confidential to the candidate and his advisors.

When a person becomes an official candidate, their Exploratory Committee becomes a Campaign Committee with many reporting requirements.

Governors

Bobby Jindal, Governor of Louisiana

Chris Christie, Governor of New Jersey

Scott Walker, Governor of Wisconsin

John Kasich, Governor of Ohio


United States Senators

Ted Cruz, representing Texas

Rand Paul, representing Kentucky

Marco Rubio, representing Florida


others

Donald Trump, self-made multi-billionaire entrepreneur

Carly Fiorina, former CEO of Hewlett-Packard

Rick Santorum, former U.S. Senator from Pennsylvania

Rick Perry, former Governor of Texas (and a 2012 candidate)

George Pataki, former Governor of New York

Michael "Mike" Huckabee, former Governor of Arkansas

Jeb Bush, former Governor of Florida




Democrats


Governors

(none)


United States Senators

(none)


others

Hillary Clinton, former U.S. Senator and Secretary of State

Jim Webb, former U.S. Senator from Virginia

Martin O'Malley, former Governor of Maryland


Note: Vice-President Joe Biden is ahead of many other Democrats in polls, but he is not a declared candidate.  He was born in 1942 and will turn 73 on November 20th.




Independents

Bernie Sanders, former Governor of Vermont

Thursday, June 11, 2015

A message for Kevin


I sure hope Kevin is listening.



These men also defended your right to sit down, Kevin.

They defended it even though it cost them a lot.


Major General Harold Greene was killed in Afghanistan August 5, 2014 and buried at Arlington National Cemetery.
(clickable link to a story dated August 15, 2014 in USA Today)

President Barak Obama didn't go to his funeral, but he did go to Michael Brown's funeral.



God bless the United States Military.
They kill our enemies
and keep us safe.


Even if it costs them their lives.



Sunday, May 24, 2015

Memorial Day 2015


This is what the Democrat Party posted on its' official Twitter account (@TheDemocrats) on Friday, May 22nd (two days ago).

The caption said "Happy Memorial Day weekend, everyone!"




Did he visit Arlington National Cemetery?  No.

Did he visit any cemetery?  No.

Does he think about the sacrifices made by our veterans?

No, he was thinking about his ice-cream cone.




The Commander of Fort Hood, Texas, the place where an Army psychiatrist named Nidal Malik Hasan, who is a member of the "religion of peace", killed 13 soldiers and wounded 30 others, ordered that its' soldiers would commemorate Memorial Day this year not with an ice-cream cone, but with a pair of boots on the ground for every one of their soldiers who was killed in Afghanistan and Iraq.


Link to a 8/30/14 story in the Los Angeles Times about Nidal Malik Hasan's request to join "the Islamic State", made from Death Row.

Every pair of boots represents a life taken
by a murderous Muslim named Nidal Hasan
at Fort Hood on November 5, 2009.
This was someone's husband
and someone else's father.
He should not have died.


The soldiers who died at Fort Hood are now eligible to receive Purple Hearts for the injuries, including the 13 soldiers who received fatal injuries.  Link to a story on the ABC News website dated February 6, 2015.

The law was changed mostly by the dedicated efforts of U.S. Senator Ted Cruz.  Link to the page, dated April 17, 2015, on his official U.S. Senate website that mentions it.



Mister President, Memorial Day is meant for remembering the people who died to preserve the liberty that we have today in America.

While you're enjoying your liberty and your ice-cream cone, we're not enjoying your disrespect for the people who made it possible for you to have either one of them. 


Tuesday, May 12, 2015

Voter identification prevents voter fraud


India is a nation that whose population is four times the United States population.  Link to statistics on the web page IndiaOnlinePages.

India's people speak more languages and dialects than we do, so it is much harder for their government to organize any nation-wide policy than it would be for our own government.  Link to the Lanaugages of India page on the website New World Encyclopedia.

If India can organize a national system of identification for their voters, then the United States can do it.

Thank you, Judy Stines, for posting this graphic
on your Twitter account @jstines3 on May 8, 2015.


Link to an accusatory article dated December 26, 2012 on the website the Huffington Post.  This article was updated February 25, 2013.

This is a tweet that was posted by U.S. Representative Sheila Jackson Lee, who claims to represent the people of the 18th Congressional District in Texas, which includes the city of Houston.  If you click on the date, you can see the tweet on her Twitter account.



The only people who should be voting in an American election are Americans.
Voters should be able to prove who they are, whether they vote in person or not.

This proof of identification would also prevent anyone from
  • voting twice,
  • voting when they're actually a citizen of another country, or
  • voting after they've died. (Yes, it has happened.)



Voter Identification Cards

An Indian voter's identification card.

This is a real identification card for a real person.
A sample voter identification card for someone who lives in Pennsylvania.
A Mexican voter's identification card.

This is a real person, too.

If India, Mexico, and the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania can do it, every state in the United States can do it.





July 18, 2016 Update

Kansas, Oklahoma, and Georgia won

A Federal judge rejected a challenge to the principle of Voter ID.

These are the first five paragraphs of a June 29, 2016 Washington Times story.  Both of the links in these paragraphs were in their story.
Kansas, Alabama and Georgia can demand their residents submit proof of citizenship before signing up to vote even if they’re using the federal government’s registration forms, a judge said Wednesday, delivering a win to states concerned about voter fraud.

The League of Women Voters and the Obama administration had tried to halt the practice, arguing that federal law doesn’t require an extensive citizenship check when people register to vote, and saying the three states were imposing an extra burden on voters.

But Judge Richard J. Leon said that while it may be an inconvenience to require proof of citizenship, and voter registration drives may have to do more work to get folks signed up, it’s not an insurmountable burden — and certainly less so than trying to explain Obamacare.

“The organizational plaintiffs and their members will undoubtedly have to expend some additional time and effort to help individuals,” Judge Leon wrote. “But let’s be candid: doing so pales in comparison to explaining to the average citizen how the [Affordable Care Act] or tax code works!”

Since the voter groups didn’t show a real and irreparable harm, he rejected their request for a preliminary injunction.
Link to the official biography of U.S. District Court Judge Richard J. Leon on the website of the U.S. Court system.

Link to his two-page PDF order.

Link to his 25-page PDF Memorandum Opinion, which states the reasons why he made this decision.

I want to thank the person who uses this Twitter account @grannyinfla16 for posting a Tweet that mentioned this story on another website.  They linked to a story on another website, which linked to the Washington Times story that I quoted here.  If you click on the date at the end of this tweet, you will be able to see her tweet on her timeline.



North Carolina lost

This is a link to a July 29, 2016 New York Times story, written in an unprofessional manner.  Their choice of adjectives and adverbs makes it clear that this newspaper has taken sides in an issue that is likely to be an important factor in the presidential election in November.

Quotes from the article that show biased reporting.  I highlighted their bias with boldfaced text.

"A federal appeals court decisively struck down North Carolina’s voter identification law on Friday ..."

"That ruling and a second wide-ranging decision on Friday, in Wisconsin, continued a string of recent court opinions against restrictive voting laws that critics say were created solely to keep minority and other traditionally Democratic voters away from the polls."

The "critics" aren't named in this article.  The NY Times is substituting this false organization for their own opinions, which belong in an editorial, not a news story.  States have the legal right to prevent non-citizens and non-residents from voting.  The State Government of North Carolina exercised their right to do so.

North Carolina lost again

These are the first two paragraphs of a February 21, 2017 story on the website of the A.B.C. News affiliate in Raleigh, North Carolina.
North Carolina's new Democratic governor and attorney general say they are ending state efforts to persuade the U.S. Supreme Court to revive a GOP-backed voter ID law that was struck down by a lower court, but Republican lawmakers say they will continue pushing for the high court's review.

Former Republican Gov. Pat McCrory last year asked the Supreme Court to review an appeals court ruling that the elections law was unconstitutional because it targeted minority voters with "almost surgical precision" to discourage Democratic support and protect Republican dominance.

For more information on the topic of Voter I.D.

I have written six blog pages about voter fraud.  Another possible topic for this series is voting by citizens of foreign countries, who don't have a legal right to vote in American elections, even if they are visiting America on our the day of any of our elections.

Link to Part 1 - about ACORN

Link to Part 2 - changing the election date

Link to Part 3 - The voting ballot of  then-Attorney-General Eric Holder could have been stolen

Link to Part 4 - tampering with the electronic voting machines

Link to Part 5 - lawsuits to change the result of an election

Link to Part 6 - about voting in the name of dead people

Wednesday, April 15, 2015

Now you know why college is so expensive


This photo, with the caption, appeared on my Twitter account.

It's so truthful, I had to share it.


This woman is Elizabeth Warren, one of the two useless U.S. Senators from my own state.

She became a Harvard University professor by claiming to be an American Indian.  Does she look like any indian that you know?

No, she doesn't attend any of the ceremonial gatherings of any American Indian tribe, and no, none of her immediate ancestors were members of any American Indian tribe.  She only made that claim in order to get an advantage in Harvard's academic hiring committee.

A few seconds ago, I performed a Google search for "fake indian".  This is the first search result.

Reason.com article about Elizabeth Warren

Sunday, April 5, 2015

These words are all synonyms


Protected Class

Affirmative Action

Reverse Discrimination

The act of giving some people rights that other people don't have.



The term "protected class", as far as I can tell, first came into legal existence in some legislation that was passed by Congress and signed by President Johnson.

Lyndon Baines Johnson was President Kennedy's Vice-President, and when President Kennedy was assassinated in 1963, Vice-President Johnson automatically became the new President.

Link to his biography on the website of the Biography Channel.

This photo shows him being sworn-in as President aboard the same airplane that carried John Kennedy's body from Dallas to Washington.  John Kennedy's widow, Jacqueline Kennedy, stood next to him in this photo.

Link to this law, called The Civil Rights Act of 1964, on the website of a U.S. Government agency called The National Archives.

Link to part of this law, Title 7, on the website of a U.S. Government agency called the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, formerly called the Commission on Civil Rights.

This law, especially this part of the law, created a special legal status for a few groups of people.  They were given some rights that other people do not have, including a special legal status if any members of these groups file lawsuits against schools, businesses, private clubs, and other organizations.

Anyone can file a lawsuit against a business.  This happens every week in some part of the country, but if someone who files a lawsuit, called a plaintiff, is a member of any of these protected classes of people, and if any of these plaintiffs are:
  • not hired,
  • not promoted,
  • fired, or
  • segregated in a way that would limit their employment opportunities
... then they receive special treatment in their lawsuit.

These words were copied verbatim from the part of the web page of the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission that discusses "unlawful employer practices".  The link to this web page has already been provided.
It shall be an unlawful employment practice for an employer -
  1. to fail or refuse to hire or to discharge any individual, or otherwise to discriminate against any individual with respect to his compensation, terms, conditions, or privileges of employment, because of such individual’s race, color, religion, sex, or national origin; or

  2. to limit, segregate, or classify his employees or applicants for employment in any way which would deprive or tend to deprive any individual of employment opportunities or otherwise adversely affect his status as an employee, because of such individual’s race, color, religion, sex, or national origin.

There are similar "unlawful practices" for employment agencies, labor organizations, training programs, and "Businesses or enterprises with personnel qualified on basis of religion, sex, or national origin; educational institutions with personnel of particular religion", according to their web page.

This is the list of the protected classes of people who have been given special protection by this 1964 law.
  • race
  • color
  • religion
  • sex
  • national origin
In other words, if you can show the judge who is deciding the merits of your lawsuit against a school, a business, a labor union, etc. that you are a member of any of these protected classes of people, then you will receive a special status that is not shared by anyone who is not a member of any of those protected classes.

In other words, these classes of people are legally allowed to discriminate against other classes of people because the protected classes have rights and the non-protected classes don't.

This is wrong, for many reasons.

One reason is because race is a concept that contradicts itself no matter how the word is defined.  Any person who defines the word will see his definition become useless as soon as people of two different races begin marrying each other and having children.

Link to my June 2012 essay The End of Racism, which proves that every definition of the word "race" contradicts itself.

Another reason is because the nationalities of a person's ancestors is often difficult or impossible to determine with enough authenticity to withstand a legal challenge in an American court.

It doesn't really matter how you define the groups of people who have been given that special status by the 1964 law.  What matters is the simple fact that it creates two classes of people.  Those who have this special status and those who don't.

This is wrong.

I started writing an essay yesterday about a law, passed in different forms by different states, called the Religious Freedom Restoration Act.  Today is Easter, and I will not spoil my good mood by working on that essay today, but I will write some more tomorrow, and I hope to publish that essay later this week.

Saturday, March 28, 2015

Due process in Islam


Remember, the United States has a very different form of due process.

That's because the United States values individual life very highly.


The United States Constitution has its' own version of due process.  It is found in the fifth amendment to this precious document.

The fifth amendment is one sentence, but I broke it up into separate clauses to make it easier to read.

No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime,

unless on a presentment or indictment of a grand jury,

except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the militia, when in actual service in time of war or public danger;

nor shall any person be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb;

nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself,

nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;

nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.

Saturday, March 21, 2015

Race for dummies


The topic of this essay is race, which some people believe is a group of people who all have similar biological qualities, including facial features and the texture of their hair.  This concept is a myth, as I showed, step-by-step, in an essay I published more than two years ago called The End of Racism.

I can prove that the concept of race is a myth.  I did it once in the other essay, but some of the words that were used were difficult to understand, so in this essay, I will use the same proof process with different words.


The group identity

This is the basic concept that some people believe.  Because they believe it, they take certain actions that are based on this belief.

They believe that there are common characteristics of people whose ancestors come from the same part of the world.  There is some biological truth to this idea.  If two dogs produce puppies, and both of the parent dogs are beagles, then the puppies cannot be born looking like cocker spaniels.

However, the people who believe in the concept of race say that each of the limited number of races in the world has common characteristics that none of the other races shares.  These people, because of this belief, want to take actions that preserve the "racial purity" of each race.  This is impossible.


A hypothetical set of races

The racial groups that other people talk about are often labeled with colors.  During my lifetime, I have heard people mention five colors: white, black, brown, yellow, and red.  Some people, who believe in this mythical concept of race, use geography to identify these groups, but both sets of people are talking about the same mythical races.

Let's make an assumption that there are five races of people.  I don't believe it, but the concept of race is much easier to be proven to be a myth if I do make this assumption, so let's make that (false) assumption.


A hypothetical mixed-race couple

Imagine a hypothetical set of two people.  A white woman and a black man.  They meet, they find that they like each other, they have sex with each other, and the woman finds out later that she is pregnant.  She gives birth to a baby boy who has a white mother and a black father.

Which of these two races is the child?

By the way, if you believe in the concept of race, and if you believe that white women do have children with black men, producing a mixed-race child, then this is the exact situation that the President of the United States is in.  He has a white mother and a black father (if you believe in the concept of separate races of people).

The President's mother,
Ann Dunham


The Dominant Race Rule

This rule is followed by many of the people who believe in the mythical concept of race.  They say, sometimes very loudly, that one race dominates all the others.  They say, very specifically, that any child that has one black parent is a black child.  The only possible alternative to this rule would be to create a brand new, sixth race just for that child and for all of the other children of mixed-race couples.

That's the only possible alternative if you still believe in the mythical concept of race.

The people who do still believe in this myth apply the Dominant Race Rule to the President of the United States.  Even though his mother was white (if you believe in the myth of race), Barak Obama is black just because his father was black.  Barak married a woman named Michelle, and they have two daughters, Malia and Sasha.


Let's re-write history

If you can make the assumption that separate races of people exist, then I can make the assumption that Barak married someone else besides Michelle.

Okay, I've made that hypothetical assumption, and I'm going to apply the same Dominant Race Rule to this new hypothetical family, so that I can see what happens.

Instead of marrying Michelle, Barak married Susan, pictured here on the right.

Barak and Susan met, fell in love, married, and now have two daughters.

Their names are Sasha and Mary.

When dogs from two different breeds have puppies, the puppies look a little like the father dog and a little like the mother dog.

Sasha and Mary look a little like Barak and a little like Susan.  This is basic biology.  You can't change it and you can't wish it didn't happen.

However, I'm going to (temporarily) apply the Dominant Race Rule.  Sasha and Mary are both black in this hypothetical family, just because Barak is black.  Remember, I had to apply the Dominant Race Rule to him, too.  Look again at the photos of his real mother.


Sasha and Mary grow up

Both of these hypothetical girls are loved by their parents, who have a happy marriage that lasts for decades.  The girls go to school, they dream about boys, and when they're old enough, they go on dates with boys.

This is Sasha, the older daughter, and her date, Jason.  They went to college together, and that's how they met.

Jason is the one wearing the R.O.T.C. t-shirt.
Jason doesn't look much like Barak Obama, Sasha's father.

Too bad, because Sasha fell in love with him during their first date, and now, she's already dreaming about her wedding day.

Two years later, they got married, and a few months after that, she found out that she was pregnant.  She delivered a healthy baby boy in a hospital delivery room (Jason waited nearby), and now, Sasha, Jason, and the boy, named Stephen, are a very happy family.

The laws of biology will apply just as much to Stephen as they did to Sasha and Mary.  He will look a little like his mother Sasha and a little like his father Jason.  That means that the color of his skin, due to the amount of pigment in it, will be lighter than the color of Sasha's skin but darker than the color of Jason's skin.

The Dominant Race Rule applies to him, also.  Just because his mother is black, he's also black.  That's the rule, and I'm going to follow it all through this hypothetical list of descendants of President Barak Obama.

All that doesn't matter to Sasha and Jason.  They love their new baby boy very much.


Stephen grows up

Like his mother, he also lives in a home with two parents that feed him, take care of him, and educate him.  While he's in high school, he meets a young woman and they go out on a few dates.  They fall in love, and they get married.  Barak Obama and his wife Susan both have a lot of gray hair now, but they both love his grandson Stephen, so he and Susan both attend the wedding and dance at the reception.

Don't they look like a happy couple?


Guess what?  This couple also has children!

Yes, it keeps happening.  Every time one of his descendants grows up, he or she keeps getting married.

Remember, the Dominant Race Rule says that any child of a black parent will be a black child, so even though the groom pictured in the photo above doesn't look black, he is still a black man, according to the rule.

The laws of biology still apply to all of this couple's children.  Each and every one of them will look a little bit like their mother and a little bit like their father.


One of these children doesn't like his parents

It's true (in this hypothetical bloodline).  Even though this couple loves all their children, one of the sons, named Michael, doesn't like being the grandson of Barak Obama, and he doesn't want to be known as Barak's grandson, so when Michael grows up, he moves to a different part of the country, changes his last name, and doesn't speak to his parents any more.

This doesn't change the laws of biology, of course.  Michael still looks a little bit like his mother and a little bit like his father.   Unfortunately for all of the people who believe in the concept of race, he doesn't look much like Barak, even though he's a direct descendant of him.  He has two parents, four grandparents, and eight great-grandparents, but only one of these people was a "purebred" black person, so after he moves to a new city, he calls himself a white man, he registers with the U.S. Census as a white man, and none of the people who look at him will disagree with him.

Oops.  Something bad just happened.  One of the two laws that I've been applying to this hypothetical bloodline has been proven to be false.  Let's see how long it will take you to answer the following not-so-hypothetical questions that are based on this hypothetical bloodline.
  1. Is this young man white or black?
  2. If he's white, as his friends and neighbors will tell you, and as the U.S. Census records will state, which pair of parents with one black parent produced a white child?
  3. If he's black, as the Dominant Race Rule will demand, why does he look so much like a white person?
  4. If he really is black, how much biological difference can there be between him and a "purebred" white person?  He's had a lot of white ancestors.  Barak's father was the only black one.
  5. Did I break the rules of biology?  Did any of these parents produce a child that looked much more like one parent than the other?  Ask a biologist whether that's possible.

The only way to resolve these not-so-hypothetical questions is to throw away the Dominant Race Rule.  It's not compatible with the laws of biology and when it's applied to real human beings, it can hurt them.


This is the only real answer

The laws of biology haven't changed in thousands of years.  Any two parents, whether they're people or dogs, will produce offspring that look a little like both of their parents.  That means that no matter how many races you think the world has, as soon as people start marrying and having children, those children will start making it impossible to classify any one person into any of these races.

You could start with five races: white, black, brown, yellow, and red, but in a very short time, you will have people from all five of these races producing children that aren't "purebred" and aren't really a member of any of those races.

The Dominant Race Rule has been proven to be a failure.  Now it's time for the concept of race itself to disappear.  It's a myth.  There is no definition of the word that can maintain itself once interracial marriages occur, producing children.

The concept of race has no real meaning.  It's a myth, and so, for decades, I have not used colors or other words based on geography to apply to real people.

Barak Obama is not a black man, he's just a man.

His father was not a black man, either.  He, also, was just a man.

Barak's mother was not a white woman, she was just a woman.


A piece of American history

Our third president was named Thomas Jefferson.  He was the main author of one of our most important documents, the Declaration of Independence.  He lived on a plantation called Monticello.  Link to his biography on the Monticello website.

Thomas owned some slaves, including this young woman named Sally Hemmings.

One day, these two people had sex with each other.  She became pregnant, and at the appropriate time, she delivered a baby.

The history I wrote earlier in this essay came true for this couple, in a very literal sense.  Their child grew up and had children of his own, who also grew up and children of their own.

The following paragraphs were copied from the story of Thomas and Sally, also on the Monticello website. The link in the first paragraph was on their web page.
In September 1802, political journalist James T. Callender, a disaffected former ally of Jefferson, wrote in a Richmond newspaper that Jefferson had for many years "kept, as his concubine, one of his own slaves." "Her name is Sally," Callender continued, adding that Jefferson had "several children" by her.

Although there had been rumors of a sexual relationship between Jefferson and an enslaved woman before 1802, Callender's article spread the story widely. It was taken up by Jefferson's Federalist opponents and was published in many newspapers during the remainder of Jefferson's presidency.

Today,  almost two centuries after this couple became parents, there are thousands of people who are direct descendants of Sally the Slave who don't look much like her, but there are also thousands of direct descendants of Thomas Jefferson who don't look much like him.  The laws of biology, as I said, still haven't changed in thousands of years.  What you look like depends very much on what your parents look like and less on what your grandparents looked like.

And the concept of race is still a meaningless concept, a worthless myth that I threw away decades ago.

I will not describe anyone using colors or any of the other words, based on geography, that are used to try to name the races.  The bloodline story I told in this essay was purely hypothetical.  I borrowed the concepts and the terminology of some people in order to show how little truth there is in them.

There is no such thing as a black man, a white man, a brown man, a yellow man, or a red man.  The people who live and die on this planet are simply human beings.

Race is a meaningless concept.

Monday, March 2, 2015

Citizen Corps local branches, part 5


These are the names of local Citizen Corps councils with internet addresses that end in numbers from 250-300

Council numbers 265, 290 292, 293, 294, 295, 296, 297, 298, and 300 had hidden information.  When I looked at those pages, I saw a blank page with the FEMA and the Citizen Corps Council logos at the top of the page.


See for yourself.  Copy and paste this address into your browser:

https://www.citizencorps.fema.gov/cc/showCouncil.do?id=290

In contrast, council number 289 doesn't exist.  Copy and paste this address into your browser.

https://www.citizencorps.fema.gov/cc/showCouncil.do?id=289

Or copy and paste this address (council number 299) into your browser.

https://www.citizencorps.fema.gov/cc/showCouncil.do?id=299

Council Number Council Name
259 Harris County (TX) Citizen Corps
260 Jefferson County (CO) Local Emergency Planning Committee
261 Shelby County (OH) Citizen Corps
263 Braintree (MA) Citizen Corps Council
264 West Palm Beach (FL) Citizen Corps Council
266 Rhode Island Citizen Corps State Council
267 Charles City County (VA) Local Emergency Planning Committee
268 Rowlett (TX) Citizen Corps Council
269 Citizen Corps Council for Homeland Security of Southern AZ
270 Wyoming Citizen Corps Council
271 King County (WA) Regional Citizen Corps Council
272 Arlington County (VA) Citizen Corps Council
273 Snohomish County (WA) Fire District #4 Citizen Corps Council
274 State of Connecticut Citizen Corps Council
275 Sedalia-Pettis County (MO) Emergency Management
276 Arlington Heights (IL) Citizen Corps Council
277 Kalamazoo County (MI) Citizen Corps Council
278 Minneapolis (MN) Citizen Corps Council
280 Albemarle County (VA) Citizens Corps
281 Melrose Park (IL) Citizen Corps Council
282 Carnation-Duval (WA) Citizen Corps Council, Inc.

Unlike all the other contact people I've seen so far,

This person's street address isn't listed.


283 Columbiana (AL) Public Safety Committee
284 Okema (OK) Emergency Management
285 Marion County (IL) Citizen Corps Council
286 Kansas City (MO) Metropolitan Community Organizations Active in Disaster
287 City of Grove (OK) Emergency Management
288 Louisville-Jefferson County (KY) Metro Citizen Corps Council

Wednesday, February 25, 2015

Citizen Corps local branches, part 4


These are the names of local Citizen Corps councils with internet addresses that end in numbers from 181-249

Council numbers 203, 204, 206, and 217 had hidden information.  When I looked at those pages, I saw a blank page with the FEMA and the Citizen Corps Council logos at the top of the page.

See for yourself.  Copy and paste this address into your browser:

https://www.citizencorps.fema.gov/cc/showCouncil.do?id=206

Council Number Council Name
181 Creek County (OK) Citizen Corps
185 Benicia (CA) Citizen Corps Council
187 Orlando (FL) Citizen Corps Council
188 Wayne Township (NJ) Citizen Corps Council
202 Citizen Corps Council of Bayamon (Puerto Rico)
205 Citizen Corps Council of Moca (Puerto Rico)
113 San Juan (PR) Citizen Corps Council
209 Citizen Corps of Allen County (IN)
210 Fresno (CA) Citizen Corps
211 Springfield (IL) Citizen Corps Council
212 Orleans (MA) Citizen Corps (It's on Cape Cod.)
213 Coshocton County (OH) Citizen Corps Coordination Council
218 Pittsburgh (PA) Emergency Management Advisory Council
219 Van Wert County (OH) Citizen Corps
221 Southeast Wisconsin Citizen Corps
222 Ramsey County (MN) Sheriff's Department
223 District of Columbia Citizen Corps Council

This organization's address is on 14th Street, NW


228 Citizen Corps of St. Joseph's County (IN)
229 Rockwall Citizens on Patrol (Rockwall, TX)
231 Cambridge (MA) Emergency Management Advisory Council
232 Noble (OK) Citizen Corps Council

Unlike all the other contact people I've seen so far,

This person's street address isn't listed.


233 Adair County (OK) Emergency Management
236 Mercer County (KY) Citizen Corps
237 Sedgwick County (KS) Local Emergency Planning Committee
239 Orange County (CA) Citizen Corps Council
241 Montgomery (AL) Local Emergency Planning Committee
243 Polk County (MO) Emergency Planning Committee
244 Citizen Corps Council of Aguadilla (Puerto Rico)
245 Citizen Corps Council of Baranquitas (Puerto Rico)

Citizen Corps local branches, part 3


These are the names of local Citizen Corps councils with internet addresses that end in numbers from 101-179

Council numbers 101, 104, and 150 had hidden information.  When I looked at those pages, I saw a blank page with the FEMA and the Citizen Corps Council logos at the top of the page.

See for yourself.  Copy and paste this address into your browser:

https://www.citizencorps.fema.gov/cc/showCouncil.do?id=150

Council Number Council Name
102 Duval County (FL) Emergency Preparedness Planning Council
105 Worcester (MA) Citizen Corps
107 Leominster (MA) Citizen Corps
110 Ponca City (OK) Citizen Corps
111 Mayes County (OK) Citizen Corps Council
112 City of Sand Springs (OK) Area Citizen Corps Council
113 Bristow (OK) Emergency Management
116 Placentia (CA) Freedom Corps
118 City of Enid (OK) Citizen Corps Council
119 Custer County (OK) Emergency Management Council
120 Huron County (OH) Citizen Corps
121 City of Muskogee (OK) Emergency Management
122 Washita County (OK) Commissioners
123 Stillwater (OK) Emergency Response Team
125 DeSoto County (MS) Emergency Management Agency
126 Southwest Louisiana Area Citizen Corps Council
128 Freehold-Caro-E. Durham-Greenville (NY) Citizen Corps Council
146 Chanesville (PA) Citizen Corps Council
148 Jasper County (TX) Citizen Corps Coordinating Council
152 Commonwealth of Pennsylvania (Note: This contact

person is a FEMA Emergency Management Supervisor.)


153 White River Valley (WA) Citizen Corps Council
159 Montgomery County (MD) Citizen Corps Council
168 Nantucket (MA) Citizen Security Commission
169 Columbiana County (OH) (EMA)
176 Claremore-Rogers County (OK) L.E.P.C.
177 Hardee County (FL) Citizen Corps
178 McIntosh County (OK) Emergency Services
179 Laguna Niquel (CA) Public Safety Committee

Citizen Corps local branches, part 2


The first part of this list was published about an hour ago, in an essay called Marxists in America.


Here are the names of all the publicly-available local Citizen Corps councils up to internet addresses that end in "100".  They all obey the Federal Emergency Management Agency, which obeys the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, which obeys the Marxist-in-Chief, Barak Obama.

A few of these councils have hidden their information from the public, as shown by blank pages instead of missing pages.  For example,when I looked up council numbers 70, 83, 89, and 91, I saw a blank page, with the FEMA and the Citizen Corps logos at the top of the page.
Council Number Council Name
031 Citizen Corps Council of Broken Arrow (OK)
034 McKenzie Valley (OR) Citizen Corps
035 Sterling Heights (MI) Citizen Corps
040 Aurora (CO) Local Emergency Planning Committee
042 Morongo Valley (CA) Citizen Corps Council
043 Durham County (NC) Local Emergency Planning Committee
045 Multnomah County (OR) Citizen Corps Council
047 Mercer County (OH) Citizen Corps Council
049 Sarasota (FL) Citizen Corps Council
053 Miami County (OH) Citizen Corps Council
056 Conway-Severn (NC) Volunteer Rescue
061 Posey County, Southwest Indiana Disaster Rescue Citizen Council
062 Josephine County (OR) Citizen Corps Council
063 Auglaize County (OH) Citizen's Council
065 York County (ME) Citizen Corps Council
066 Omaha (NE) Police Department Crime Prevention Unit
068 Tippecanoe County (IN) Citizen Corps Council
071 Taylorsville (UT) Safety Committee
072 Emergency Services Coordinating Agency (located in Brier, WA)
076 Wood Dale (IL) Citizen Corps Council
078 Redmond (WA) Citizen Corps Council
079 Mississippi County (AR) Emergency Operations Council
080 Clark County (WA) Fire District 11
081 Town of Oro Valley (AZ) Citizen Corps Council
084 Sierra County (NM) Local Emergency Planning Committee
090 Hallandale Beach (FL) Citizen Corps Council
092 Town of Secaucus (NJ) Citizen Corps
093 Curry County (OR) Citizens for Emergency Preparedness
097 Hainesville (IL) Citizen Corps Council
098 Tuscarawas County (OH) Citizen Corps Council)

Wednesday, February 11, 2015

Freedom of choice in Islam


Can Jews and Christians leave their religion and become members of another religion because their beliefs have changed?

Can Muslims leave their religion and become Jews or Christians because their beliefs have changed?

... without any fear that they'll be killed?



What does Islam offer to its' believers besides a theological prison-for-life?

Wednesday, January 14, 2015

Boycott Sky News (U.K.)


When it was time to stand up and be counted, honoring the victims of a Muslim massacre, they sat down.



This video was uploaded to YouTube today, January 14, 2015.

The newscaster apologized to any Muslims who might have been offended by seeing the magazine cover, but she did not apologize to the families of the people who were killed by Muslims in Paris just a few days ago.




Boycott these Twitter accounts

@SkyNews @SkyNewsBreak @SkyNewsHD
@SkyNewsHQ @SkyFootball @SkySpiortsLFS



Boycott their online news

Sky News Online, including their U.K., U.S., Austalian, and World news headlines.

Boycott their streaming sports news also.  No, I won't provide any links.  If you're a subscriber, cancel your subscription.  The victims of the violent Muslims in Paris will thank you from Heaven.

Saturday, January 10, 2015