Wednesday, April 15, 2015

Now you know why college is so expensive


This photo, with the caption, appeared on my Twitter account.

It's so truthful, I had to share it.


This woman is Elizabeth Warren, one of the two useless U.S. Senators from my own state.

She became a Harvard University professor by claiming to be an American Indian.  Does she look like any indian that you know?

No, she doesn't attend any of the ceremonial gatherings of any American Indian tribe, and no, none of her immediate ancestors were members of any American Indian tribe.  She only made that claim in order to get an advantage in Harvard's academic hiring committee.

Her $400,000 salary as a Harvard Professor is documented by this MassLive arbicle, this CNBC article, this ABC News story, and this CNN-Business article.

A few seconds ago, I performed a Google search for "fake indian".  This is the first search result.

Reason.com article about Elizabeth Warren


September 10, 2019 update

This drawing ...


... was found in this tweet.  I have saved the image for use later if Pocahontas becomes the presidential nominee of the Democrat Party.



March 2, 2020 update

Dan is a former member of the U.S. Secret Service who was assigned one of the most important jobs within that agency - guarding the life of the President of the United States. His Twitter account is verified. It is followed by 1.5 million other people, including Sean Hannity, who only follows four people in the whole world.

Sunday, April 5, 2015

Protected classes of people are always discrimination


Protected Class

Affirmative Action

Reverse Discrimination

The act of giving some people rights that other people don't have.



The term "protected class", as far as I can tell, first came into legal existence in some legislation that was passed by Congress and signed by President Johnson.

Lyndon Baines Johnson was President Kennedy's Vice-President, and when President Kennedy was assassinated in 1963, Vice-President Johnson automatically became the new President.

Link to his biography on the website of the Biography Channel.

This photo shows him being sworn-in as President aboard the same airplane that carried John Kennedy's body from Dallas to Washington.  John Kennedy's widow, Jacqueline Kennedy, stood next to him in this photo.

Link to this law, called The Civil Rights Act of 1964, on the website of a U.S. Government agency called The National Archives.

Link to part of this law, Title 7, on the website of a U.S. Government agency called the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, formerly called the Commission on Civil Rights.

This law, especially this part of the law, created a special legal status for a few groups of people.  They were given some rights that other people do not have, including a special legal status if any members of these groups file lawsuits against schools, businesses, private clubs, and other organizations.

Anyone can file a lawsuit against a business.  This happens every week in some part of the country, but if someone who files a lawsuit, called a plaintiff, is a member of any of these protected classes of people, and if any of these plaintiffs are:
  • not hired,
  • not promoted,
  • fired, or
  • segregated in a way that would limit their employment opportunities
... then they receive special treatment in their lawsuit.

These words were copied verbatim from the part of the web page of the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission that discusses "unlawful employer practices".  The link to this web page has already been provided.
It shall be an unlawful employment practice for an employer -
  1. to fail or refuse to hire or to discharge any individual, or otherwise to discriminate against any individual with respect to his compensation, terms, conditions, or privileges of employment, because of such individual’s race, color, religion, sex, or national origin; or

  2. to limit, segregate, or classify his employees or applicants for employment in any way which would deprive or tend to deprive any individual of employment opportunities or otherwise adversely affect his status as an employee, because of such individual’s race, color, religion, sex, or national origin.

There are similar "unlawful practices" for employment agencies, labor organizations, training programs, and "Businesses or enterprises with personnel qualified on basis of religion, sex, or national origin; educational institutions with personnel of particular religion", according to their web page.

This is the list of the protected classes of people who have been given special protection by this 1964 law.
  • race
  • color
  • religion
  • sex
  • national origin
In other words, if you can show the judge who is deciding the merits of your lawsuit against a school, a business, a labor union, etc. that you are a member of any of these protected classes of people, then you will receive a special status that is not shared by anyone who is not a member of any of those protected classes.

In other words, these classes of people are legally allowed to discriminate against other classes of people because the protected classes have rights and the non-protected classes don't.

This is wrong, for many reasons.

One reason is because race is a concept that contradicts itself no matter how the word is defined.  Any person who defines the word will see his definition become useless as soon as people of two different races begin marrying each other and having children.

Link to my June 2012 essay The End of Racism, which proves that every definition of the word "race" contradicts itself.

Another reason is because the nationalities of a person's ancestors is often difficult or impossible to determine with enough authenticity to withstand a legal challenge in an American court.

It doesn't really matter how you define the groups of people who have been given that special status by the 1964 law.  What matters is the simple fact that it creates two classes of people.  Those who have this special status and those who don't.

This is wrong.

I started writing an essay yesterday about a law, passed in different forms by different states, called the Religious Freedom Restoration Act.  Today is Easter, and I will not spoil my good mood by working on that essay today, but I will write some more tomorrow, and I hope to publish that essay later this week.

Saturday, March 28, 2015

Due process in Islam


Remember, the United States has a very different form of due process.

That's because the United States values individual life very highly.


The United States Constitution has its' own version of due process.  It is found in the fifth amendment to this precious document.

The fifth amendment is one sentence, but I broke it up into separate clauses to make it easier to read.

No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime,

unless on a presentment or indictment of a grand jury,

except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the militia, when in actual service in time of war or public danger;

nor shall any person be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb;

nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself,

nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;

nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.

Saturday, March 21, 2015

Race for dummies


The topic of this essay is race, which some people believe is a group of people who all have similar biological qualities, including facial features and the texture of their hair.  This concept is a myth, as I showed, step-by-step, in an essay I published more than two years ago called The End of Racism.

I can prove that the concept of race is a myth.  I did it once in the other essay, but some of the words that were used were difficult to understand, so in this essay, I will use the same proof process with different words.


The group identity

This is the basic concept that some people believe.  Because they believe it, they take certain actions that are based on this belief.

They believe that there are common characteristics of people whose ancestors come from the same part of the world.  There is some biological truth to this idea.  If two dogs produce puppies, and both of the parent dogs are beagles, then the puppies cannot be born looking like cocker spaniels.

However, the people who believe in the concept of race say that each of the limited number of races in the world has common characteristics that none of the other races shares.  These people, because of this belief, want to take actions that preserve the "racial purity" of each race.  This is impossible.


A hypothetical set of races

The racial groups that other people talk about are often labeled with colors.  During my lifetime, I have heard people mention five colors: white, black, brown, yellow, and red.  Some people, who believe in this mythical concept of race, use geography to identify these groups, but both sets of people are talking about the same mythical races.

Let's make an assumption that there are five races of people.  I don't believe it, but the concept of race is much easier to be proven to be a myth if I do make this assumption, so let's make that (false) assumption.


A hypothetical mixed-race couple

Imagine a hypothetical set of two people.  A white woman and a black man.  They meet, they find that they like each other, they have sex with each other, and the woman finds out later that she is pregnant.  She gives birth to a baby boy who has a white mother and a black father.

Which of these two races is the child?

By the way, if you believe in the concept of race, and if you believe that white women do have children with black men, producing a mixed-race child, then this is the exact situation that the President of the United States is in.  He has a white mother and a black father (if you believe in the concept of separate races of people).

The President's mother,
Ann Dunham


The Dominant Race Rule

This rule is followed by many of the people who believe in the mythical concept of race.  They say, sometimes very loudly, that one race dominates all the others.  They say, very specifically, that any child that has one black parent is a black child.  The only possible alternative to this rule would be to create a brand new, sixth race just for that child and for all of the other children of mixed-race couples.

That's the only possible alternative if you still believe in the mythical concept of race.

The people who do still believe in this myth apply the Dominant Race Rule to the President of the United States.  Even though his mother was white (if you believe in the myth of race), Barak Obama is black just because his father was black.  Barak married a woman named Michelle, and they have two daughters, Malia and Sasha.


Let's re-write history

If you can make the assumption that separate races of people exist, then I can make the assumption that Barak married someone else besides Michelle.

Okay, I've made that hypothetical assumption, and I'm going to apply the same Dominant Race Rule to this new hypothetical family, so that I can see what happens.

Instead of marrying Michelle, Barak married Susan, pictured here on the right.

Barak and Susan met, fell in love, married, and now have two daughters.

Their names are Sasha and Mary.

When dogs from two different breeds have puppies, the puppies look a little like the father dog and a little like the mother dog.

Sasha and Mary look a little like Barak and a little like Susan.  This is basic biology.  You can't change it and you can't wish it didn't happen.

However, I'm going to (temporarily) apply the Dominant Race Rule.  Sasha and Mary are both black in this hypothetical family, just because Barak is black.  Remember, I had to apply the Dominant Race Rule to him, too.  Look again at the photos of his real mother.


Sasha and Mary grow up

Both of these hypothetical girls are loved by their parents, who have a happy marriage that lasts for decades.  The girls go to school, they dream about boys, and when they're old enough, they go on dates with boys.

This is Sasha, the older daughter, and her date, Jason.  They went to college together, and that's how they met.

Jason is the one wearing the R.O.T.C. t-shirt.
Jason doesn't look much like Barak Obama, Sasha's father.

Too bad, because Sasha fell in love with him during their first date, and now, she's already dreaming about her wedding day.

Two years later, they got married, and a few months after that, she found out that she was pregnant.  She delivered a healthy baby boy in a hospital delivery room (Jason waited nearby), and now, Sasha, Jason, and the boy, named Stephen, are a very happy family.

The laws of biology will apply just as much to Stephen as they did to Sasha and Mary.  He will look a little like his mother Sasha and a little like his father Jason.  That means that the color of his skin, due to the amount of pigment in it, will be lighter than the color of Sasha's skin but darker than the color of Jason's skin.

The Dominant Race Rule applies to him, also.  Just because his mother is black, he's also black.  That's the rule, and I'm going to follow it all through this hypothetical list of descendants of President Barak Obama.

All that doesn't matter to Sasha and Jason.  They love their new baby boy very much.


Stephen grows up

Like his mother, he also lives in a home with two parents that feed him, take care of him, and educate him.  While he's in high school, he meets a young woman and they go out on a few dates.  They fall in love, and they get married.  Barak Obama and his wife Susan both have a lot of gray hair now, but they both love his grandson Stephen, so he and Susan both attend the wedding and dance at the reception.

Don't they look like a happy couple?


Guess what?  This couple also has children!

Yes, it keeps happening.  Every time one of his descendants grows up, he or she keeps getting married.

Remember, the Dominant Race Rule says that any child of a black parent will be a black child, so even though the groom pictured in the photo above doesn't look black, he is still a black man, according to the rule.

The laws of biology still apply to all of this couple's children.  Each and every one of them will look a little bit like their mother and a little bit like their father.


One of these children doesn't like his parents

It's true (in this hypothetical bloodline).  Even though this couple loves all their children, one of the sons, named Michael, doesn't like being the grandson of Barak Obama, and he doesn't want to be known as Barak's grandson, so when Michael grows up, he moves to a different part of the country, changes his last name, and doesn't speak to his parents any more.

This doesn't change the laws of biology, of course.  Michael still looks a little bit like his mother and a little bit like his father.   Unfortunately for all of the people who believe in the concept of race, he doesn't look much like Barak, even though he's a direct descendant of him.  He has two parents, four grandparents, and eight great-grandparents, but only one of these people was a "purebred" black person, so after he moves to a new city, he calls himself a white man, he registers with the U.S. Census as a white man, and none of the people who look at him will disagree with him.

Oops.  Something bad just happened.  One of the two laws that I've been applying to this hypothetical bloodline has been proven to be false.  Let's see how long it will take you to answer the following not-so-hypothetical questions that are based on this hypothetical bloodline.
  1. Is this young man white or black?
  2. If he's white, as his friends and neighbors will tell you, and as the U.S. Census records will state, which pair of parents with one black parent produced a white child?
  3. If he's black, as the Dominant Race Rule will demand, why does he look so much like a white person?
  4. If he really is black, how much biological difference can there be between him and a "purebred" white person?  He's had a lot of white ancestors.  Barak's father was the only black one.
  5. Did I break the rules of biology?  Did any of these parents produce a child that looked much more like one parent than the other?  Ask a biologist whether that's possible.

The only way to resolve these not-so-hypothetical questions is to throw away the Dominant Race Rule.  It's not compatible with the laws of biology and when it's applied to real human beings, it can hurt them.


This is the only real answer

The laws of biology haven't changed in thousands of years.  Any two parents, whether they're people or dogs, will produce offspring that look a little like both of their parents.  That means that no matter how many races you think the world has, as soon as people start marrying and having children, those children will start making it impossible to classify any one person into any of these races.

You could start with five races: white, black, brown, yellow, and red, but in a very short time, you will have people from all five of these races producing children that aren't "purebred" and aren't really a member of any of those races.

The Dominant Race Rule has been proven to be a failure.  Now it's time for the concept of race itself to disappear.  It's a myth.  There is no definition of the word that can maintain itself once interracial marriages occur, producing children.

The concept of race has no real meaning.  It's a myth, and so, for decades, I have not used colors or other words based on geography to apply to real people.

Barak Obama is not a black man, he's just a man.

His father was not a black man, either.  He, also, was just a man.

Barak's mother was not a white woman, she was just a woman.


A piece of American history

Our third president was named Thomas Jefferson.  He was the main author of one of our most important documents, the Declaration of Independence.  He lived on a plantation called Monticello.  Link to his biography on the Monticello website.

Thomas owned some slaves, including this young woman named Sally Hemmings.

One day, these two people had sex with each other.  She became pregnant, and at the appropriate time, she delivered a baby.

The history I wrote earlier in this essay came true for this couple, in a very literal sense.  Their child grew up and had children of his own, who also grew up and children of their own.

The following paragraphs were copied from the story of Thomas and Sally, also on the Monticello website. The link in the first paragraph was on their web page.
In September 1802, political journalist James T. Callender, a disaffected former ally of Jefferson, wrote in a Richmond newspaper that Jefferson had for many years "kept, as his concubine, one of his own slaves." "Her name is Sally," Callender continued, adding that Jefferson had "several children" by her.

Although there had been rumors of a sexual relationship between Jefferson and an enslaved woman before 1802, Callender's article spread the story widely. It was taken up by Jefferson's Federalist opponents and was published in many newspapers during the remainder of Jefferson's presidency.

Today,  almost two centuries after this couple became parents, there are thousands of people who are direct descendants of Sally the Slave who don't look much like her, but there are also thousands of direct descendants of Thomas Jefferson who don't look much like him.  The laws of biology, as I said, still haven't changed in thousands of years.  What you look like depends very much on what your parents look like and less on what your grandparents looked like.

And the concept of race is still a meaningless concept, a worthless myth that I threw away decades ago.

I will not describe anyone using colors or any of the other words, based on geography, that are used to try to name the races.  The bloodline story I told in this essay was purely hypothetical.  I borrowed the concepts and the terminology of some people in order to show how little truth there is in them.

There is no such thing as a black man, a white man, a brown man, a yellow man, or a red man.  The people who live and die on this planet are simply human beings.

Race is a meaningless concept.

Monday, March 2, 2015

Citizen Corps local branches, part 5


These are the names of local Citizen Corps councils with internet addresses that end in numbers from 250-300

Council numbers 265, 290 292, 293, 294, 295, 296, 297, 298, and 300 had hidden information.  When I looked at those pages, I saw a blank page with the FEMA and the Citizen Corps Council logos at the top of the page.


See for yourself.  Copy and paste this address into your browser:

https://www.citizencorps.fema.gov/cc/showCouncil.do?id=290

In contrast, council number 289 doesn't exist.  Copy and paste this address into your browser.

https://www.citizencorps.fema.gov/cc/showCouncil.do?id=289

Or copy and paste this address (council number 299) into your browser.

https://www.citizencorps.fema.gov/cc/showCouncil.do?id=299

Council Number Council Name
259 Harris County (TX) Citizen Corps
260 Jefferson County (CO) Local Emergency Planning Committee
261 Shelby County (OH) Citizen Corps
263 Braintree (MA) Citizen Corps Council
264 West Palm Beach (FL) Citizen Corps Council
266 Rhode Island Citizen Corps State Council
267 Charles City County (VA) Local Emergency Planning Committee
268 Rowlett (TX) Citizen Corps Council
269 Citizen Corps Council for Homeland Security of Southern AZ
270 Wyoming Citizen Corps Council
271 King County (WA) Regional Citizen Corps Council
272 Arlington County (VA) Citizen Corps Council
273 Snohomish County (WA) Fire District #4 Citizen Corps Council
274 State of Connecticut Citizen Corps Council
275 Sedalia-Pettis County (MO) Emergency Management
276 Arlington Heights (IL) Citizen Corps Council
277 Kalamazoo County (MI) Citizen Corps Council
278 Minneapolis (MN) Citizen Corps Council
280 Albemarle County (VA) Citizens Corps
281 Melrose Park (IL) Citizen Corps Council
282 Carnation-Duval (WA) Citizen Corps Council, Inc.

Unlike all the other contact people I've seen so far,

This person's street address isn't listed.


283 Columbiana (AL) Public Safety Committee
284 Okema (OK) Emergency Management
285 Marion County (IL) Citizen Corps Council
286 Kansas City (MO) Metropolitan Community Organizations Active in Disaster
287 City of Grove (OK) Emergency Management
288 Louisville-Jefferson County (KY) Metro Citizen Corps Council

Wednesday, February 25, 2015

Citizen Corps local branches, part 4


These are the names of local Citizen Corps councils with internet addresses that end in numbers from 181-249

Council numbers 203, 204, 206, and 217 had hidden information.  When I looked at those pages, I saw a blank page with the FEMA and the Citizen Corps Council logos at the top of the page.

See for yourself.  Copy and paste this address into your browser:

https://www.citizencorps.fema.gov/cc/showCouncil.do?id=206

Council Number Council Name
181 Creek County (OK) Citizen Corps
185 Benicia (CA) Citizen Corps Council
187 Orlando (FL) Citizen Corps Council
188 Wayne Township (NJ) Citizen Corps Council
202 Citizen Corps Council of Bayamon (Puerto Rico)
205 Citizen Corps Council of Moca (Puerto Rico)
113 San Juan (PR) Citizen Corps Council
209 Citizen Corps of Allen County (IN)
210 Fresno (CA) Citizen Corps
211 Springfield (IL) Citizen Corps Council
212 Orleans (MA) Citizen Corps (It's on Cape Cod.)
213 Coshocton County (OH) Citizen Corps Coordination Council
218 Pittsburgh (PA) Emergency Management Advisory Council
219 Van Wert County (OH) Citizen Corps
221 Southeast Wisconsin Citizen Corps
222 Ramsey County (MN) Sheriff's Department
223 District of Columbia Citizen Corps Council

This organization's address is on 14th Street, NW


228 Citizen Corps of St. Joseph's County (IN)
229 Rockwall Citizens on Patrol (Rockwall, TX)
231 Cambridge (MA) Emergency Management Advisory Council
232 Noble (OK) Citizen Corps Council

Unlike all the other contact people I've seen so far,

This person's street address isn't listed.


233 Adair County (OK) Emergency Management
236 Mercer County (KY) Citizen Corps
237 Sedgwick County (KS) Local Emergency Planning Committee
239 Orange County (CA) Citizen Corps Council
241 Montgomery (AL) Local Emergency Planning Committee
243 Polk County (MO) Emergency Planning Committee
244 Citizen Corps Council of Aguadilla (Puerto Rico)
245 Citizen Corps Council of Baranquitas (Puerto Rico)

Citizen Corps local branches, part 3


These are the names of local Citizen Corps councils with internet addresses that end in numbers from 101-179

Council numbers 101, 104, and 150 had hidden information.  When I looked at those pages, I saw a blank page with the FEMA and the Citizen Corps Council logos at the top of the page.

See for yourself.  Copy and paste this address into your browser:

https://www.citizencorps.fema.gov/cc/showCouncil.do?id=150

Council Number Council Name
102 Duval County (FL) Emergency Preparedness Planning Council
105 Worcester (MA) Citizen Corps
107 Leominster (MA) Citizen Corps
110 Ponca City (OK) Citizen Corps
111 Mayes County (OK) Citizen Corps Council
112 City of Sand Springs (OK) Area Citizen Corps Council
113 Bristow (OK) Emergency Management
116 Placentia (CA) Freedom Corps
118 City of Enid (OK) Citizen Corps Council
119 Custer County (OK) Emergency Management Council
120 Huron County (OH) Citizen Corps
121 City of Muskogee (OK) Emergency Management
122 Washita County (OK) Commissioners
123 Stillwater (OK) Emergency Response Team
125 DeSoto County (MS) Emergency Management Agency
126 Southwest Louisiana Area Citizen Corps Council
128 Freehold-Caro-E. Durham-Greenville (NY) Citizen Corps Council
146 Chanesville (PA) Citizen Corps Council
148 Jasper County (TX) Citizen Corps Coordinating Council
152 Commonwealth of Pennsylvania (Note: This contact

person is a FEMA Emergency Management Supervisor.)


153 White River Valley (WA) Citizen Corps Council
159 Montgomery County (MD) Citizen Corps Council
168 Nantucket (MA) Citizen Security Commission
169 Columbiana County (OH) (EMA)
176 Claremore-Rogers County (OK) L.E.P.C.
177 Hardee County (FL) Citizen Corps
178 McIntosh County (OK) Emergency Services
179 Laguna Niquel (CA) Public Safety Committee